\n\n\n\n\n\n \n
Explore Rankings
Research field intelligence

Immunology and Microbiology Research Strength

Explore universities with the strongest current Immunology and Microbiology topic signals in the ITS Research Intelligence database, alongside institution-level research performance and growth.

Research landscape

Immunology and Microbiology currently has 35 index-ready universities contributing strong topic signals in the local database. Their aggregated topic-signal volume is 167,380 works. The average overall ITS Research Performance Score across this set is 0.0, while average five-year publication growth is -9.3%.

The ranking below combines the strength of an institution’s field signal with its overall research-performance score and recent growth. It should be read as a research-intelligence indicator, not as a complete subject ranking of teaching, reputation, facilities or student outcomes.

Leading universities in Immunology and Microbiology

RankUniversityCountryField scoreField signalOverall worksGrowth
#1Harvard UniversityUnited States66.025,379156,655-24.4%
#2University of PennsylvaniaUnited States61.511,89778,911-16.2%
#3University of California, San FranciscoUnited States61.311,77072,937-18.8%
#4Emory UniversityUnited States61.110,64063,631-9.4%
#5University of PittsburghUnited States60.75,49892,22186.4%
#6University of Alabama at BirminghamUnited States59.78,42038,277-6.6%
#7Stanford UniversityUnited States59.78,674124,451-11.6%
#8Karolinska InstitutetSweden58.77,54562,423-13.9%
#9University of WashingtonUnited States58.77,821108,488-20.0%
#10Johns Hopkins UniversityUnited States56.85,808124,053-18.0%
#11The University of MelbourneAustralia56.25,183102,835-15.1%
#12Washington University in St. LouisUnited States56.15,07666,456-15.2%
#13Yale UniversityUnited States55.53,290116,26340.1%
#14University of North Carolina at Chapel HillUnited States55.23,733100,28111.4%
#15University of Colorado DenverUnited States54.64,13635,368-19.2%
#16University of LausanneSwitzerland53.83,47135,548-11.9%
#17University of California San DiegoUnited States53.33,15989,480-8.9%
#18London School of Hygiene & Tropical MedicineUnited Kingdom52.83,46631,301-36.6%
#19Cornell UniversityUnited States52.72,895106,688-9.7%
#20University of Maryland, BaltimoreUnited States52.02,76028,479-19.2%
#21Case Western Reserve UniversityUnited States51.92,71532,459-18.8%
#22University of MinnesotaUnited States51.52,59455,139-22.9%
#23Albert Einstein College of MedicineUnited States51.22,41519,800-19.4%
#24University of AmsterdamThe Netherlands50.81,99664,7081.4%
#25University of the WitwatersrandSouth Africa49.81,91730,919-17.3%
#26University of FreiburgGermany49.61,39439,83529.8%
#27Monash UniversityAustralia49.31,77691,042-16.0%
#28Johannes Gutenberg University MainzGermany49.31,56934,5952.7%
#29University of TübingenGermany48.91,60138,123-10.0%
#30George Washington UniversityUnited States48.91,65128,601-15.2%
#31University of BirminghamUnited Kingdom48.91,54052,705-4.1%
#32University of BaselSwitzerland48.31,55031,842-18.5%
#33Nanjing Medical UniversityChina47.81,53252,873-30.3%
#34University of IowaUnited States47.61,31733,333-10.8%
#35University of GenoaItaly47.41,19228,1690.3%

How to interpret this field page

Field classifications are inferred from the scholarly works associated with institutions in OpenAlex. An institution can therefore appear strongly in several fields at once, and topic classifications may evolve as the scholarly graph is updated. ITS Research Solution does not infer a faculty or department simply from the existence of a topic signal.

Quality before quantity

Why every database record does not become an SEO page

ITS Research Solution only indexes pages when the underlying data is rich enough to support useful comparison and interpretation. Registry-only records, short research histories, missing topics and low-completeness profiles stay in the database but remain outside the public sitemap. This prevents repetitive, thin institution and subject pages.

Read the full methodology · Review data sources