Worldwide University Research Database
Search real institution-level research data, compare output and impact, and move from a directory entry to evidence-based research intelligence.
Leading research universities
These profiles meet the public quality gate: enough recent research activity, multi-year history and subject signals to support a substantive analytical page rather than a thin directory record.
University College London
Stanford University
University of Washington
University of Oxford
University of Toronto
University of Cambridge
Johns Hopkins University
Imperial College London
Tsinghua University
University of Hong Kong
National University of Singapore
Yale University
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cornell University
Zhejiang University
Université Paris Cité
Peking University
Chinese University of Hong Kong
University of Pennsylvania
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
University of British Columbia
University of California San Diego
How ITS Research Score v3 is constructed
One formula applies to every index-ready institution, using the five most recent complete calendar years: 25% research output, 25% citations, 20% h-index and 5% i10-index (log-normalized so the largest universities do not dominate linearly), 15% citation impact (the institution’s percentile on citations per work, reduced below 500 works so small samples cannot win by chance), 5% publication growth and 5% international-collaboration share. When collaboration data is not yet available, the other weights are rescaled.
Data-quality controls: the unfinished current year is never counted, and a year in which recorded output jumps to more than three times the institution’s usual level while being at least 90% open access is treated as a bulk dataset or repository deposit and scored at the usual level. Raw data are kept and every adjustment is logged. Open-access share and topic diversity are published as separate rankings and do not affect the main score. Citation impact is not field-normalized.
These indicators assess research activity only. They do not measure teaching quality, student experience, employability, reputation, finances or accreditation. Missing data are left missing rather than fabricated.