\n\n\n\n\n\n \n
Explore Rankings
Research field intelligence

Agricultural and Biological Sciences Research Strength

Explore universities with the strongest current Agricultural and Biological Sciences topic signals in the ITS Research Intelligence database, alongside institution-level research performance and growth.

Research landscape

Agricultural and Biological Sciences currently has 78 index-ready universities contributing strong topic signals in the local database. Their aggregated topic-signal volume is 290,787 works. The average overall ITS Research Performance Score across this set is 0.0, while average five-year publication growth is -4.5%.

The ranking below combines the strength of an institution’s field signal with its overall research-performance score and recent growth. It should be read as a research-intelligence indicator, not as a complete subject ranking of teaching, reputation, facilities or student outcomes.

Leading universities in Agricultural and Biological Sciences

RankUniversityCountryField scoreField signalOverall worksGrowth
#1China Agricultural UniversityChina66.219,04545,051-18.8%
#2Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Brazil66.118,65157,671-19.9%
#3University of FloridaUnited States65.414,98086,629-0.5%
#4University of MilanItaly64.53,872216,132444.4%
#5Iowa State UniversityUnited States62.310,34424,730-17.9%
#6University of California, DavisUnited States62.110,69163,142-26.7%
#7University of GeorgiaUnited States61.48,49127,879-6.2%
#8North Carolina State UniversityUnited States60.97,63339,511-2.9%
#9Wageningen University & ResearchThe Netherlands60.57,39241,300-6.1%
#10Universidade Federal do ParanáBrazil60.47,76437,685-16.8%
#11University of California, RiversideUnited States60.47,79824,977-18.7%
#12University of GöttingenGermany59.16,05754,334-9.2%
#13University of Cape TownSouth Africa59.06,328253,330-18.7%
#14University of Chinese Academy of SciencesChina58.96,434185,542-23.8%
#15Hokkaido UniversityJapan58.71,615102,279467.0%
#16Cornell UniversityUnited States58.05,149106,688-9.7%
#17University of Nebraska–LincolnUnited States57.84,05825,75525.7%
#18Michigan State UniversityUnited States57.72,32895,081113.2%
#19Universidade de São PauloBrazil57.55,202128,674-22.8%
#20Karlsruhe Institute of TechnologyGermany57.14,25659,083-1.3%
#21University of ZurichSwitzerland56.94,55558,065-16.2%
#22The University of Western AustraliaAustralia56.94,69940,709-22.2%
#23Universidad Nacional de ColombiaColombia56.64,40126,219-17.4%
#24Université de MontpellierFrance56.64,75053,953-32.1%
#25Washington State UniversityUnited States56.24,16925,256-18.8%
#26King Saud UniversitySaudi Arabia56.13,98873,158-15.6%
#27University of LiègeBelgium56.14,91362,113-70.9%
#28University of ExeterUnited Kingdom56.03,62242,781-1.4%
#29University of WürzburgGermany55.73,68622,453-11.7%
#30University of MissouriUnited States55.73,51926,737-4.7%
#31University College DublinIreland55.53,20334,2137.4%
#32Universidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoMexico55.33,58672,878-16.9%
#33Imperial College LondonUnited Kingdom55.23,495108,283-15.0%
#34Université de LorraineFrance54.63,93857,825-49.3%
#35University of British ColumbiaCanada54.42,267108,56636.6%
#36Uppsala UniversitySweden54.43,67364,840-43.0%
#37University of JohannesburgSouth Africa53.83,11742,691-31.2%
#38Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)Brazil53.72,77959,868-16.1%
#39Macquarie UniversityAustralia53.52,70931,457-15.7%
#40Oregon Health & Science UniversityUnited States53.51,86338,93145.7%
#41University of LausanneSwitzerland53.12,48635,548-11.9%
#42Jagiellonian UniversityPoland52.61,98742,64312.3%
#43Texas Tech UniversityUnited States52.62,11727,3841.5%
#44University of MinnesotaUnited States52.52,43155,139-22.9%
#45University of HelsinkiFinland52.22,13661,302-9.4%
#46Lund UniversitySweden52.12,10456,995-9.9%
#47University of KansasUnited States52.01,98621,406-2.8%
#48Colorado State UniversityUnited States51.81,98328,220-7.4%
#49Charles UniversityCzechia51.51,73646,0598.6%
#50Arizona State UniversityUnited States51.51,89447,052-5.9%
#51University of ViennaAustria51.51,79243,9151.2%
#52Universidade Federal de Minas GeraisBrazil51.41,91046,423-11.5%
#53University of SheffieldUnited Kingdom51.11,81943,898-11.5%
#54University of GroningenThe Netherlands50.71,73949,355-14.1%
#55Lanzhou UniversityChina50.31,52447,191-0.1%
#56University of Tennessee at KnoxvilleUnited States50.21,62332,805-13.7%
#57Aarhus UniversityDenmark50.21,76663,686-28.5%
#58Université Libre de BruxellesBelgium50.11,62027,286-16.9%
#59University of KentuckyUnited States49.91,15038,79336.3%
#60University of TurinItaly49.91,52545,845-10.7%
#61Virginia TechUnited States49.91,52539,801-11.5%
#62Ghent UniversityBelgium49.81,56843,906-18.1%
#63Stockholm UniversitySweden49.81,57233,007-18.9%
#64University of Massachusetts AmherstUnited States49.81,59727,632-22.5%
#65Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyNorway49.61,26650,30011.4%
#66Université de BordeauxFrance48.91,39934,784-23.2%
#67Nantes UniversitéFrance48.81,56136,897-42.5%
#68University of BelgradeSerbia48.51,14738,909-0.3%
#69Indiana University BloomingtonUnited States48.21,17921,627-11.7%
#70Freie Universität BerlinGermany48.11,35037,640-37.0%
#71Universidad de Buenos AiresArgentina47.91,32431,997-39.1%
#72Universidade do PortoPortugal47.61,14750,018-21.1%
#73University of TehranIran47.61,18037,689-25.9%
#74University of TurkuFinland47.51,02833,313-5.2%
#75University of ConnecticutUnited States47.11,08524,293-24.0%
#76University of ZagrebCroatia46.190532,553-19.3%
#77University of ManitobaCanada45.682227,383-16.3%
#78Queen's UniversityCanada45.378428,079-15.9%

How to interpret this field page

Field classifications are inferred from the scholarly works associated with institutions in OpenAlex. An institution can therefore appear strongly in several fields at once, and topic classifications may evolve as the scholarly graph is updated. ITS Research Solution does not infer a faculty or department simply from the existence of a topic signal.

Quality before quantity

Why every database record does not become an SEO page

ITS Research Solution only indexes pages when the underlying data is rich enough to support useful comparison and interpretation. Registry-only records, short research histories, missing topics and low-completeness profiles stay in the database but remain outside the public sitemap. This prevents repetitive, thin institution and subject pages.

Read the full methodology · Review data sources