Universities by Research Impact
The Impact Score combines citation intensity, h-index, mean citedness and i10 visibility. It is not presented as a field-normalized citation score.
Ranking table
The table is recalculated after database refreshes. Because citation and affiliation metadata change over time, the ranking is presented as a dated analytical snapshot rather than a permanent claim.
| Rank | University | Country | Score | 5-year works | 5-year citations | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | University of Washington | United States | 68.9 | 116,133 | 1,572,311 | 0.7% |
| #2 | Academy of Medicine | Singapore | 67.7 | 321 | 125,551 | 71.1% |
| #3 | Harvard University | United States | 67.1 | 173,192 | 3,458,186 | -2.7% |
| #4 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | United States | 64.6 | 65,399 | 1,130,870 | 6.8% |
| #5 | Stanford University | United States | 64.3 | 130,687 | 2,021,646 | 0.4% |
| #6 | Harvard–MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology | United States | 64.2 | 1,330 | 44,993 | -16.2% |
| #7 | University of Pennsylvania | United States | 63.0 | 85,351 | 1,379,416 | 1.6% |
| #8 | Northwestern University | United States | 62.6 | 58,235 | 1,035,865 | -2.2% |
| #9 | University College London | United Kingdom | 62.5 | 172,008 | 2,443,901 | 11.1% |
| #10 | California Institute of Technology | United States | 62.4 | 32,692 | 475,971 | -1.0% |
| #11 | Johns Hopkins University | United States | 62.3 | 130,229 | 1,800,641 | -4.1% |
| #12 | Tsinghua University | China | 62.2 | 136,887 | 2,366,826 | 30.4% |
| #13 | University of Cambridge | United Kingdom | 62.1 | 116,710 | 1,632,130 | -0.8% |
| #14 | Rockefeller University | United States | 62.0 | 6,583 | 134,878 | 29.6% |
| #15 | University of California, San Francisco | United States | 61.7 | 78,367 | 1,154,116 | 2.3% |
| #16 | National University of Singapore | Singapore | 61.4 | 86,173 | 1,472,459 | 16.8% |
| #17 | Institute of Cancer Research | United Kingdom | 61.4 | 5,325 | 118,076 | -13.6% |
| #18 | Princeton University | United States | 61.3 | 44,013 | 637,257 | 4.6% |
| #19 | Nanyang Technological University | Singapore | 61.3 | 59,190 | 1,078,171 | 21.4% |
| #20 | Imperial College London | United Kingdom | 61.2 | 116,645 | 1,541,914 | -1.3% |
| #21 | University of Toronto | Canada | 61.1 | 147,822 | 1,953,104 | 0.9% |
| #22 | Cornell University | United States | 61.1 | 110,486 | 1,397,475 | 7.6% |
| #23 | The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center | United States | 61.1 | 15,109 | 339,858 | 9.2% |
| #24 | University of California San Diego | United States | 61.1 | 91,957 | 1,286,994 | 5.0% |
| #25 | Oncode Institute | The Netherlands | 61.0 | 5,349 | 145,201 | -0.1% |
| #26 | Weizmann Institute of Science | Israel | 61.0 | 13,966 | 255,820 | -2.7% |
| #27 | University of Michigan | United States | 61.0 | 119,673 | 1,489,386 | 4.8% |
| #28 | Columbia University | United States | 60.9 | 85,462 | 1,137,213 | 2.9% |
| #29 | University of Science and Technology of China | China | 60.9 | 89,129 | 1,480,499 | 26.7% |
| #30 | European Graduate School of Neuroscience | Netherlands | 60.9 | 125 | 7,321 | 13.6% |
| #31 | Université Paris Cité | France | 60.9 | 92,495 | 1,240,549 | 8.1% |
| #32 | Washington University in St. Louis | United States | 60.7 | 69,100 | 896,664 | 3.3% |
| #33 | University of Chinese Academy of Sciences | China | 60.6 | 195,306 | 3,173,752 | -5.6% |
| #34 | City University of Hong Kong | Hong Kong | 60.4 | 42,788 | 825,814 | 36.8% |
| #35 | The University of Queensland | Australia | 60.4 | 80,120 | 1,100,408 | -1.0% |
| #36 | University of Oxford | United Kingdom | 60.3 | 181,718 | 1,981,134 | -1.9% |
| #37 | Heidelberg University | Germany | 60.3 | 81,873 | 1,043,700 | -2.9% |
| #38 | College Board | United States | 60.2 | 177 | 4,705 | 108.2% |
| #39 | University of California, Berkeley | United States | 60.1 | 90,219 | 1,124,753 | -10.8% |
| #40 | Karolinska Institutet | Sweden | 60.0 | 65,806 | 913,304 | 5.8% |
| #41 | Cheung Kong Graduate School of Business | China | 59.9 | 342 | 16,237 | 83.9% |
| #42 | University of Minnesota | United States | 59.9 | 60,557 | 810,861 | -6.8% |
| #43 | Center for Life Sciences | China | 59.9 | 8,150 | 190,938 | -2.5% |
| #44 | Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences | China | 59.8 | 2,766 | 67,277 | -33.6% |
| #45 | University of Hong Kong | Hong Kong | 59.8 | 83,864 | 1,206,224 | 40.2% |
| #46 | University of California, Los Angeles | United States | 59.8 | 101,122 | 1,222,341 | -0.1% |
| #47 | University of Amsterdam | The Netherlands | 59.7 | 63,870 | 976,160 | 4.7% |
| #48 | UNSW Sydney | Australia | 59.7 | 80,632 | 1,190,352 | -5.2% |
| #49 | The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center | United States | 59.7 | 41,739 | 594,281 | 25.6% |
| #50 | Zhejiang University | China | 59.7 | 159,128 | 2,235,549 | 21.1% |
| #51 | Hunan University | China | 59.6 | 42,183 | 764,452 | 42.6% |
| #52 | Boston University | United States | 59.6 | 46,726 | 642,048 | 2.4% |
| #53 | University of Colorado Denver | United States | 59.6 | 37,854 | 652,771 | 0.5% |
| #54 | University of Glasgow | United Kingdom | 59.6 | 52,133 | 668,829 | 13.4% |
| #55 | University of Groningen | The Netherlands | 59.5 | 51,696 | 715,580 | -4.5% |
| #56 | McMaster University | Canada | 59.5 | 49,086 | 730,881 | 0.8% |
| #57 | Monash University | Australia | 59.4 | 95,198 | 1,368,088 | 4.6% |
| #58 | Beijing University of Chemical Technology | China | 59.4 | 23,001 | 451,121 | 25.9% |
| #59 | The University of Sydney | Australia | 59.4 | 94,178 | 1,200,869 | 2.8% |
| #60 | Baylor College of Medicine | United States | 59.4 | 43,046 | 546,611 | 3.9% |
| #61 | Huazhong University of Science and Technology | China | 59.4 | 110,703 | 1,567,220 | 9.9% |
| #62 | University of Zurich | Switzerland | 59.3 | 61,651 | 748,628 | 1.0% |
| #63 | Hong Kong Polytechnic University | Hong Kong | 59.2 | 56,867 | 982,455 | 62.9% |
| #64 | Indiana University Bloomington | United States | 59.1 | 22,992 | 409,880 | 8.0% |
| #65 | Hong Kong University of Science and Technology | Hong Kong | 59.1 | 32,533 | 548,576 | 60.2% |
| #66 | Shanghai Jiao Tong University | China | 59.1 | 162,490 | 2,193,445 | 13.6% |
| #67 | University of Birmingham | United Kingdom | 59.1 | 54,889 | 710,066 | 13.5% |
| #68 | University of Chicago | United States | 59.1 | 74,344 | 828,571 | 15.1% |
| #69 | Nanjing University | China | 59.1 | 67,196 | 971,606 | 26.7% |
| #70 | University of Southern California | United States | 59.0 | 62,414 | 759,601 | 4.0% |
| #71 | Chinese University of Hong Kong | Hong Kong | 59.0 | 62,844 | 928,374 | 38.3% |
| #72 | Peking University | China | 59.0 | 166,278 | 2,006,191 | 5.9% |
| #73 | Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian | United States | 59.0 | 8,519 | 163,697 | 0.0% |
| #74 | University of Maryland, College Park | United States | 58.9 | 49,484 | 634,761 | 9.6% |
| #75 | Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai | United States | 58.9 | 59,027 | 766,984 | -20.9% |
| #76 | Lackland Independent School District | United States | 58.8 | 113 | 2,756 | -22.0% |
| #77 | Yale University | United States | 58.8 | 114,240 | 1,266,921 | 65.6% |
| #78 | KU Leuven | Belgium | 58.8 | 84,133 | 1,027,092 | 4.6% |
| #79 | ETH Zurich | Switzerland | 58.7 | 76,360 | 1,012,193 | 10.6% |
| #80 | École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne | Switzerland | 58.7 | 45,144 | 564,571 | 16.8% |
| #81 | University of Edinburgh | United Kingdom | 58.7 | 77,640 | 932,337 | 8.0% |
| #82 | University of California, Santa Cruz | United States | 58.7 | 19,428 | 261,116 | 7.5% |
| #83 | King Abdullah University of Science and Technology | Saudi Arabia | 58.7 | 22,459 | 380,855 | 21.8% |
| #84 | University of Bristol | United Kingdom | 58.7 | 54,967 | 766,615 | 6.4% |
| #85 | King's College London | United Kingdom | 58.7 | 81,426 | 1,050,790 | 5.3% |
| #86 | The University of Melbourne | Australia | 58.7 | 108,688 | 1,292,642 | 5.6% |
| #87 | Wuhan University | China | 58.6 | 90,814 | 1,261,487 | 15.0% |
| #88 | Bond University | Australia | 58.6 | 5,236 | 208,261 | 13.4% |
| #89 | University of Wisconsin–Madison | United States | 58.6 | 76,160 | 843,870 | 12.6% |
| #90 | New York University | United States | 58.6 | 70,745 | 837,501 | 18.8% |
| #91 | Duke University | United States | 58.6 | 72,420 | 855,997 | 4.8% |
| #92 | Radboud University Nijmegen | The Netherlands | 58.5 | 58,188 | 712,942 | 0.3% |
| #93 | University of British Columbia | Canada | 58.5 | 94,995 | 1,157,422 | -1.2% |
| #94 | Queen Mary University of London | United Kingdom | 58.5 | 41,746 | 581,929 | 15.3% |
| #95 | Innovative Genomics Institute | United States | 58.5 | 1,186 | 34,778 | 8.9% |
| #96 | Pennsylvania State University | United States | 58.3 | 67,548 | 757,529 | -0.8% |
| #97 | Institut für Schlaganfall- und Demenzforschung | Germany | 58.3 | 1,121 | 32,552 | 5.8% |
| #98 | Molecular Immunity Unit | United Kingdom | 58.3 | 255 | 11,417 | -32.5% |
| #99 | University of Manchester | United Kingdom | 58.3 | 77,584 | 918,032 | 10.7% |
| #100 | Georgia Institute of Technology | United States | 58.2 | 45,821 | 577,013 | 0.3% |
How ITS Research Score v3 is constructed
One formula applies to every index-ready institution, using the five most recent complete calendar years: 25% research output, 25% citations, 20% h-index and 5% i10-index (log-normalized so the largest universities do not dominate linearly), 15% citation impact (the institution’s percentile on citations per work, reduced below 500 works so small samples cannot win by chance), 5% publication growth and 5% international-collaboration share. When collaboration data is not yet available, the other weights are rescaled.
Data-quality controls: the unfinished current year is never counted, and a year in which recorded output jumps to more than three times the institution’s usual level while being at least 90% open access is treated as a bulk dataset or repository deposit and scored at the usual level. Raw data are kept and every adjustment is logged. Open-access share and topic diversity are published as separate rankings and do not affect the main score. Citation impact is not field-normalized.
These indicators assess research activity only. They do not measure teaching quality, student experience, employability, reputation, finances or accreditation. Missing data are left missing rather than fabricated.