\n\n\n\n\n\n \n
Explore Rankings
ITS Research Intelligence

Sudan University Research Rankings

Compare Sudan universities using recent research output, citation impact, growth and a transparent research-performance score.

Research landscape

The current ITS Research Intelligence dataset contains 37 index-ready universities in Sudan. Across those institutions, the average five-year research output is approximately 857 works and the average five-year citation count is approximately 3,009. The average publication-growth signal is 43.4%. These figures describe the institutions that pass the public quality gate; they are not intended to represent every tertiary institution in the country.

Country rankings are useful for benchmarking because they reduce some of the structural differences that make global comparisons difficult. They still should not be treated as a complete assessment of institutional quality: teaching, student outcomes, funding levels, research field mix and institutional mission are outside this research-performance score. The value of the page is in seeing who is producing research, how that activity is changing, and where citation visibility is concentrated.

Top research universities in Sudan

RankUniversityCountryScore5-year works5-year citationsGrowth
#1University of KhartoumSudan70.56,61927,504-17.5%
#2National UniversitySudan67.91,36517,47863.0%
#3Sudan University of Science and TechnologySudan62.62,3829,3474.7%
#4University of GeziraSudan61.72,2528,632-19.0%
#5Al-Neelain UniversitySudan59.41,9364,9703.6%
#6Omdurman Islamic UniversitySudan57.81,5845,278-12.6%
#7University of Medical Sciences and TechnologySudan57.71,0502,34236.0%
#8International University of AfricaSudan56.16513,01370.4%
#9The Future UniversitySudan56.03831,033260.6%
#10University of the Holy Quran and Islamic SciencesSudan55.92,105353652.2%
#11University of BahriSudan54.91,0612,6976.0%
#12Sudan Medical Specialization BoardSudan54.89041,80221.4%
#13National Ribat UniversitySudan54.18321,52744.5%
#14Red Sea UniversitySudan54.05182,53149.1%
#15University of KordofanSudan52.76421,76922.8%
#16Alzaiem Alazhari UniversitySudan52.59461,957-20.3%
#17University of NyalaSudan52.43731,78143.0%
#18Nile Valley UniversitySudan52.37481,986-7.4%
#19Ahfad University for WomenSudan52.25441,16632.3%
#20Kassala UniversitySudan52.13391,09589.9%
#21Karary UniversitySudan50.94851,01054.1%
#22Gadarif UniversitySudan48.94031,1886.2%
#23University of Science and Technology OmdurmanSudan48.53941,156-15.3%
#24Shendi UniversitySudan48.04441,602-26.0%
#25Sudan Academy of SciencesSudan47.43001,404-34.3%
#26University of El Imam El MahdiSudan46.83361,030-10.1%
#27Sinnar UniversitySudan45.523333371.0%
#28University of BakhtalrudaSudan45.23091,133-5.5%
#29Mashreq UniversitySudan44.732959216.5%
#30Sudan International UniversitySudan44.624845139.5%
#31Khartoum International Institute for Arabic LanguagueSudan44.317526546.4%
#32University of DongolaSudan43.616131677.1%
#33Bayan UniversitySudan42.91101,502-26.8%
#34Al Fashir UniversitySudan42.413627455.8%
#35Omdurman Ahlia UniversitySudan41.815031744.4%
#36AlMughtaribeen UniversitySudan39.3149354-8.3%
#37Wad Medani Ahlia UniversitySudan37.4120147-2.2%
Transparent methodology

How ITS Research Score v2 is constructed

Every index-ready institution has a base score from recent output, citations, h-index, i10-index and publication growth. After deep enrichment completes, ITS Research Score v2 uses six dimensions: 25% output strength, 30% Research Impact Score, 20% Momentum Score, 10% international-collaboration share, 5% open-access share and 10% topic-diversity signal. Output and citation-scale terms are log-normalized to reduce domination by the largest universities.

Research Impact Score combines citation intensity, h-index, two-year mean citedness when available and i10 visibility. It is intentionally not called field-normalized impact. International collaboration is based on recent works with authors from more than one country. Research diversity is an entropy-based summary of the institution’s leading topic signals, not a department count.

These indicators assess research activity only. They do not measure teaching quality, student experience, employability, reputation, finances or accreditation. Missing data are left missing rather than fabricated.