\n\n\n\n\n\n \n
Explore Rankings
ITS Research Intelligence

Lithuania University Research Rankings

Compare Lithuania universities using recent research output, citation impact, growth and a transparent research-performance score.

Research landscape

The current ITS Research Intelligence dataset contains 30 index-ready universities in Lithuania. Across those institutions, the average five-year research output is approximately 1,472 works and the average five-year citation count is approximately 7,711. The average publication-growth signal is 33.3%. These figures describe the institutions that pass the public quality gate; they are not intended to represent every tertiary institution in the country.

Country rankings are useful for benchmarking because they reduce some of the structural differences that make global comparisons difficult. They still should not be treated as a complete assessment of institutional quality: teaching, student outcomes, funding levels, research field mix and institutional mission are outside this research-performance score. The value of the page is in seeing who is producing research, how that activity is changing, and where citation visibility is concentrated.

Top research universities in Lithuania

RankUniversityCountryScore5-year works5-year citationsGrowth
#1Vilnius UniversityLithuania78.213,74783,209-7.0%
#2Kaunas University of TechnologyLithuania72.05,43842,284-5.8%
#3Lithuanian University of Health SciencesLithuania71.44,88225,846-0.7%
#4Vilnius Gediminas Technical UniversityLithuania70.24,61622,19310.2%
#5Vytautas Magnus UniversityLithuania68.14,31023,564-8.1%
#6Klaipėda UniversityLithuania63.31,7318,30822.4%
#7Lithuanian Sports UniversityLithuania61.09874,24668.0%
#8Vilnius University of Applied SciencesLithuania61.01,2423,29892.9%
#9Mykolas Romeris UniversityLithuania60.21,6937,063-17.7%
#10Kauno kolegija Higher Education InstitutionLithuania55.91,0411,34964.8%
#11Kaunas University of Applied Engineering SciencesLithuania53.0308670160.3%
#12Kazimieras Simonavičius UniversityLithuania52.14051,12985.8%
#13ISM University of Management and EconomicsLithuania51.42581,50947.1%
#14Klaipėdos valstybinė kolegija / Higher Education InstitutionLithuania49.43601,016112.2%
#15Vilnius Business CollegeLithuania48.8264469118.6%
#16Šiauliai UniversityLithuania48.5317983-18.9%
#17Vilnius College of Technologies and DesignLithuania46.82591,179-6.7%
#18Lithuanian Institute of HistoryLithuania46.0354550-18.6%
#19Lithuanian Maritime AcademyLithuania44.3131206156.7%
#20European Humanities UniversityLithuania42.9275277-19.7%
#21Utenos kolegija Higher Education InstitutionLithuania42.415921363.3%
#22Vilnius College of DesignLithuania42.311322258.3%
#23Lithuania Business University of Applied ScienceLithuania41.410223896.7%
#24LCC International UniversityLithuania40.618830820.6%
#25Panevėžys CollegeLithuania40.3105260-15.0%
#26Šiauliai State Higher Education InstitutionLithuania40.124420631.7%
#27International Business School at Vilnius UniversityLithuania39.71122310.0%
#28SMK University of Applied Social SciencesLithuania38.0208172-38.0%
#29Vilnius Academy of ArtsLithuania35.7181117-26.5%
#30Lithuanian Academy of Music and TheatreLithuania28.714322-29.1%
Transparent methodology

How ITS Research Score v2 is constructed

Every index-ready institution has a base score from recent output, citations, h-index, i10-index and publication growth. After deep enrichment completes, ITS Research Score v2 uses six dimensions: 25% output strength, 30% Research Impact Score, 20% Momentum Score, 10% international-collaboration share, 5% open-access share and 10% topic-diversity signal. Output and citation-scale terms are log-normalized to reduce domination by the largest universities.

Research Impact Score combines citation intensity, h-index, two-year mean citedness when available and i10 visibility. It is intentionally not called field-normalized impact. International collaboration is based on recent works with authors from more than one country. Research diversity is an entropy-based summary of the institution’s leading topic signals, not a department count.

These indicators assess research activity only. They do not measure teaching quality, student experience, employability, reputation, finances or accreditation. Missing data are left missing rather than fabricated.