\n\n\n\n\n\n \n
Explore Rankings
ITS Research Intelligence

Jordan University Research Rankings

Compare Jordan universities using recent research output, citation impact, growth and a transparent research-performance score.

Research landscape

The current ITS Research Intelligence dataset contains 28 index-ready universities in Jordan. Across those institutions, the average five-year research output is approximately 3,777 works and the average five-year citation count is approximately 37,886. The average publication-growth signal is 126.7%. These figures describe the institutions that pass the public quality gate; they are not intended to represent every tertiary institution in the country.

Country rankings are useful for benchmarking because they reduce some of the structural differences that make global comparisons difficult. They still should not be treated as a complete assessment of institutional quality: teaching, student outcomes, funding levels, research field mix and institutional mission are outside this research-performance score. The value of the page is in seeing who is producing research, how that activity is changing, and where citation visibility is concentrated.

Top research universities in Jordan

RankUniversityCountryScore5-year works5-year citationsGrowth
#1Applied Science Private UniversityJordan75.47,39384,368254.1%
#2Al-Ahliyya Amman UniversityJordan74.74,91383,698209.5%
#3University of JordanJordan74.618,591166,83743.8%
#4Middle East UniversityJordan72.43,26654,389430.3%
#5Jordan University of Science and TechnologyJordan70.912,43794,40419.6%
#6Zarqa UniversityJordan69.55,36243,105468.1%
#7Hashemite UniversityJordan69.37,17763,11240.3%
#8Al-Balqa Applied UniversityJordan69.16,77362,93442.2%
#9Al al-Bayt UniversityJordan68.73,14640,09492.4%
#10Jadara UniversityJordan68.52,69628,699526.2%
#11Amman Arab UniversityJordan68.12,11338,97797.3%
#12Yarmouk UniversityJordan67.86,88354,86541.4%
#13Isra UniversityJordan67.02,36636,55014.8%
#14Al-Zaytoonah University of JordanJordan67.03,45932,554117.7%
#15Petra UniversityJordan65.72,14219,030168.4%
#16Mutah UniversityJordan64.43,75229,39938.1%
#17Al-Hussein Bin Talal UniversityJordan64.11,90020,38721.7%
#18German Jordanian UniversityJordan63.81,88719,42429.6%
#19Princess Sumaya University for TechnologyJordan63.01,85420,07928.9%
#20Philadelphia UniversityJordan62.693213,99632.8%
#21Irbid National UniversityJordan61.71,10711,233111.7%
#22Tafila Technical UniversityJordan59.31,33511,8658.2%
#23Jerash UniversityJordan58.61,3718,173178.0%
#24American University of MadabaJordan57.56856,80334.8%
#25World Islamic Sciences and Education UniversityJordan55.48006,19242.2%
#26Al Hussein Technical UniversityJordan53.33695,00755.0%
#27Ajloun National UniversityJordan52.48033,229348.2%
#28Arab Open UniversityJordan41.22411,39651.9%
Transparent methodology

How ITS Research Score v3 is constructed

One formula applies to every index-ready institution, using the five most recent complete calendar years: 25% research output, 25% citations, 20% h-index and 5% i10-index (log-normalized so the largest universities do not dominate linearly), 15% citation impact (the institution’s percentile on citations per work, reduced below 500 works so small samples cannot win by chance), 5% publication growth and 5% international-collaboration share. When collaboration data is not yet available, the other weights are rescaled.

Data-quality controls: the unfinished current year is never counted, and a year in which recorded output jumps to more than three times the institution’s usual level while being at least 90% open access is treated as a bulk dataset or repository deposit and scored at the usual level. Raw data are kept and every adjustment is logged. Open-access share and topic diversity are published as separate rankings and do not affect the main score. Citation impact is not field-normalized.

These indicators assess research activity only. They do not measure teaching quality, student experience, employability, reputation, finances or accreditation. Missing data are left missing rather than fabricated.