\n\n\n\n\n\n \n
Explore Rankings
ITS Research Intelligence

Ecuador University Research Rankings

Compare Ecuador universities using recent research output, citation impact, growth and a transparent research-performance score.

Research landscape

The current ITS Research Intelligence dataset contains 63 index-ready universities in Ecuador. Across those institutions, the average five-year research output is approximately 2,445 works and the average five-year citation count is approximately 7,625. The average publication-growth signal is 126.0%. These figures describe the institutions that pass the public quality gate; they are not intended to represent every tertiary institution in the country.

Country rankings are useful for benchmarking because they reduce some of the structural differences that make global comparisons difficult. They still should not be treated as a complete assessment of institutional quality: teaching, student outcomes, funding levels, research field mix and institutional mission are outside this research-performance score. The value of the page is in seeing who is producing research, how that activity is changing, and where citation visibility is concentrated.

Top research universities in Ecuador

RankUniversityCountryScore5-year works5-year citationsGrowth
#1Universidad San Francisco de QuitoEcuador66.27,71543,79960.3%
#2Universidad Espíritu SantoEcuador65.73,59930,25689.0%
#3Universidad de Las AméricasEcuador64.34,94530,07470.2%
#4Escuela Superior Politecnica del LitoralEcuador63.34,14927,9331.0%
#5National Polytechnic SchoolEcuador62.14,08922,49157.0%
#6Universidad UTEEcuador61.41,87114,58275.6%
#7Universidad del AzuayEcuador60.52,26118,590-7.0%
#8Universidad Yachay TechEcuador59.81,23810,8838.9%
#9Pontificia Universidad Católica del EcuadorEcuador58.87,91422,99835.9%
#10University of CuencaEcuador58.35,42120,2225.1%
#11Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas ESPEEcuador56.64,00115,53214.4%
#12Universidad Regional Amazónica IKIAMEcuador56.38476,3724.7%
#13Universidad Técnica Particular de LojaEcuador56.34,27614,30839.3%
#14Central University of EcuadorEcuador55.47,43613,54373.0%
#15Universidad Católica de Santiago de GuayaquilEcuador55.12,2518,41355.4%
#16University of GuayaquilEcuador54.79,53614,07472.6%
#17Politecnica Salesiana UniversityEcuador54.43,51910,56173.5%
#18Universidad EcotecEcuador54.31,2056,429107.9%
#19Universidad Técnica de ManabíEcuador53.86,84317,52221.4%
#20Universidad Internacional del EcuadorEcuador53.41,8966,56795.3%
#21Universidad Nacional de LojaEcuador53.22,4419,28219.5%
#22Universidad IndoaméricaEcuador52.23,1498,24577.1%
#23Universidad Técnica de AmbatoEcuador51.55,62710,13241.2%
#24Escuela Superior Politécnica del ChimborazoEcuador51.35,2169,1761.4%
#25Universidad Estatal AmazónicaEcuador50.91,3914,52885.8%
#26Universidad Técnica Federico Santa MaríaEcuador50.48601,867261.6%
#27Universidad Técnica del NorteEcuador50.31,5604,47896.1%
#28Universidad Católica de CuencaEcuador50.37,76211,58716.8%
#29Universidad Nacional de ChimborazoEcuador50.02,9476,42863.1%
#30Universidad Tecnica de MachalaEcuador48.63,8664,819105.6%
#31Universidad Técnica Estatal de QuevedoEcuador48.52,4915,22326.3%
#32Universidad Laica Eloy Alfaro de ManabíEcuador47.83,1864,30696.3%
#33Instituto Superior Tecnológico LojaEcuador47.81,9143,021176.2%
#34Universidad Internacional SEKEcuador47.76602,37942.0%
#35Universidad Estatal Península de Santa ElenaEcuador47.21,4093,58276.6%
#36Instituto Geofísico de la Escuela Politécnica NacionalEcuador46.82281,728-38.3%
#37Universidad Técnica "Luis Vargas Torres"Ecuador46.61,2633,33054.8%
#38Universidad Estatal de MilagroEcuador46.51,9675,460-47.8%
#39Universidad Técnica de CotopaxiEcuador45.81,6733,002118.8%
#40Universidad Agraria del EcuadorEcuador45.48181,898107.6%
#41Universidad Estatal de BolívarEcuador45.31,0312,08825.3%
#42Universidad Politécnica Estatal del CarchiEcuador45.36151,286239.3%
#43Universidad Estatal del Sur de ManabiEcuador44.02,0622,84647.8%
#44Escuela Superior Politécnica Agropecuaria de Manabí Manuel Félix LópezEcuador43.39141,161212.6%
#45Universidad San Gregorio de PortoviejoEcuador43.21,4451,607179.9%
#46Universidad Técnica de BabahoyoEcuador43.02,3191,112151.0%
#47Universidad Regional Autónoma de Los AndesEcuador42.15,0532,9007.6%
#48Universidad Del Pacífico EcuadorEcuador41.9145925319.1%
#49Universidad Iberoamericana del EcuadorEcuador40.8441744481.0%
#50Universidad de los HemisferiosEcuador40.3475766108.3%
#51Instituto de Altos Estudios NacionalesEcuador40.253069451.3%
#52Escuela Politécnica Javeriana del EcuadorEcuador38.7144414140.0%
#53Universidad MetropolitanaEcuador38.272974337.6%
#54Universidad Tecnológica Empresarial de GuayaquilEcuador36.8369600121.6%
#55Universidad IsraelEcuador36.7260486178.6%
#56Instituto Superior Tecnológico Tsa´chilaEcuador35.9156260700.0%
#57Universidad Casa GrandeEcuador35.5186402100.0%
#58Universidad de OtavaloEcuador35.227443624.5%
#59Universidad Laica Vicente Rocafuerte de GuayaquilEcuador34.644643912.2%
#60Universidad de las ArtesEcuador33.750519922.9%
#61Instituto Superior Tecnológico de Artes del EcuadorEcuador33.2198166348.3%
#62Universidad Intercultural de las Nacionalidades y Pueblos Indígenas Amawtay WasiEcuador33.11611782,033.3%
#63Instituto Superior Tecnológico JapónEcuador30.612429664.0%
Transparent methodology

How ITS Research Score v3 is constructed

One formula applies to every index-ready institution, using the five most recent complete calendar years: 25% research output, 25% citations, 20% h-index and 5% i10-index (log-normalized so the largest universities do not dominate linearly), 15% citation impact (the institution’s percentile on citations per work, reduced below 500 works so small samples cannot win by chance), 5% publication growth and 5% international-collaboration share. When collaboration data is not yet available, the other weights are rescaled.

Data-quality controls: the unfinished current year is never counted, and a year in which recorded output jumps to more than three times the institution’s usual level while being at least 90% open access is treated as a bulk dataset or repository deposit and scored at the usual level. Raw data are kept and every adjustment is logged. Open-access share and topic diversity are published as separate rankings and do not affect the main score. Citation impact is not field-normalized.

These indicators assess research activity only. They do not measure teaching quality, student experience, employability, reputation, finances or accreditation. Missing data are left missing rather than fabricated.