Explore Rankings
Compare journals

Contaduría Universidad de Antioquia vs Lúmina vs Revista Visión Contable

Side-by-side figures for 3 journals from open data, 2021–2025. Bold marks the highest value in rows where more is higher (score, papers, citations, h-index). It does not mean a journal is the right one for your paper.

MeasureContaduría Universidad de Antioquia
Remove
Lúmina
Remove
Revista Visión Contable
Remove
ITS Journal Score40.941.530.6
Global rank#27,415 of 62,158#26,783 of 62,158#39,658 of 62,158
FieldBusiness, Management and AccountingBusiness, Management and AccountingBusiness, Management and Accounting
Rank in field#1,221 of 3,140#1,200 of 3,140#1,925 of 3,140
Papers 2021–2025967669
Citations 2021–20251589573
Citations per paper1.61.31.1
h-index16108
2-year mean citedness0.410.900.27
Change in papers (2024-25 vs 2021-22)Not enough papersNot enough papersNot enough papers
Citation impact trendNot enough dataNot enough dataNot enough data
Open-access share100%100%100%
Listed in DOAJYesNot yet checkedYes
Article fee (APC)Fee not recorded in our dataFee not recorded in our dataFee not recorded in our data
PublisherUniversidad de AntioquiaUniversidad de ManizalesUniversidad Autonoma Latinoamericana
CountryNot recordedColombiaColombia
Top topicsAccounting and Financial Management (42%)
Business, Education, Mathematics Research (21%)
Business, Innovation, and Economy (14%)
Accounting and Financial Management (35%)
Business, Innovation, and Economy (16%)
Business, Education, Mathematics Research (15%)
Accounting and Financial Management (33%)
Business, Education, Mathematics Research (22%)
Business, Innovation, and Economy (20%)
Papers in 202119148
Papers in 2022241124
Papers in 202316237
Papers in 2024181417
Papers in 2025191413

Figures come from OpenAlex (papers, citations, h-index, topics) and DOAJ (listing and fees). "Not recorded" means the open data has no value; it does not mean the journal is free. Citation impact trend compares how often a journal's 2024-25 papers are cited with how often its 2021-22 papers were cited, each measured against all ranked journals' papers of the same years, so newer papers are not at a disadvantage. "Not enough papers" or "Not enough data" means fewer than 50 papers in one of the two-year periods (or fewer than 50 citations to the earlier papers). Values above +300% or below -90% are shown as "+300% or more" or "-90% or less": such extreme values come from very low citation counts for the earlier papers. To compare other journals, use the journal finder and tick 2 to 4 journals.

Before you submit

Use this table to narrow a shortlist. Read each journal's aims and scope and recent articles, check its peer-review and fee policy on its own website, and confirm any indexing with the indexer itself.

Transparent methodology

How the ITS Journal Score works

One formula applies to every ranked journal, using open data from OpenAlex: 45% citation impact, 35% h-index and 20% size (papers published 2021–2025). Citation impact is the smaller of the journal's two-year mean citedness and its five-year citations per paper, so a journal whose output collapsed cannot jump to the top on old citations. Each part is half a percentile and half a log-scaled value, so the very top is still separated. Growth and open-access share are shown separately and are not part of the score.

A journal is ranked only if it published at least 50 papers in 2021–2025 and was active in at least five of the last six years. Field rankings compare a journal only with journals in the same field; the field is the OpenAlex field with most of the journal's recent papers, or "Multidisciplinary" when no field has 30% of them.

What this is not: the ITS Journal Score is not a Journal Impact Factor, CiteScore or SJR, and this site does not say whether a journal is indexed in Scopus, Web of Science or PubMed. Always confirm aims and scope, indexing, peer review and fees on the journal's own website before you submit.